• W K Miles, D W Chang, S S Kroll, M J Miller, H N Langstein, G P Reece, G R Evans, and G L Robb.
• Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
• Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000 Jun 1; 105 (7): 2387-94.

AbstractTotal sacrectomies for cancer ablation often result in extensive defects that are challenging to reconstruct. In an effort to elucidate the criteria to select the most effective reconstructive options, we reviewed our experience with the management of large sacral wound defects. All patients who had a sacral defect reconstruction after a total sacrectomy at our institution between January of 1993 and August of 1998 were reviewed. The size of the defect, the type of reconstruction, postoperative complications, and functional outcome in each patient were assessed. A total of 27 flaps were performed in 25 patients for sacral defect reconstruction after a total sacrectomy. Diagnoses consisted of chordoma (n = 13), giant cell carcinoma (n = 2), sarcoma (n = 5), rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 4), and radiation induced necrosis (n = 1). The size of sacral defects ranged from 18 to 450 cm2 (mean, 189.8 cm2). Ten patients, including five who had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent transpelvic vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reconstruction for sacral defects with a mean size of 203.3 cm2. Of these, five patients (50 percent) had complications (four minor wound dehiscences and one seroma). Eight patients, including one who had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent bilateral gluteal advancement flap reconstruction for sacral defects with a mean size of 198.0 cm2. They had no complications. Two patients, both of whom had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent gluteal rotation flap reconstruction for sacral defects of 120 cm2 and 144 cm2. Both patients had complications (one partial flap loss and one nonhealing wound requiring a free flap). Three patients, including one who had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent reconstruction with combined gluteal and posterior thigh flaps for sacral defects with a mean size of 246 cm2; two of these patients had partial necrosis of the posterior thigh flaps. Three patients, all of whom had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent free flap reconstruction for sacral defects with a mean size of 144.3 cm2. They had no complications. Our experience suggests that there are three reliable options for the reconstruction of large sacral wound defects: bilateral gluteal advancement flaps, transpelvic rectus myocutaneous flaps, and free flaps. In patients with no preoperative radiation therapy and intact gluteal vessels, the use of bilateral gluteal advancement flaps should be considered. In patients with a history of radiation to the sacral area and in patients whose gluteal vessels have been damaged, the use of the transpelvic VRAM flap should be considered. If the transpelvic VRAM flap cannot be used because of previous abdominal surgery, a free flap should be considered as a last option.

17 keywords...

hide…