• Dig Liver Dis · Oct 2006

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of methylene blue-directed biopsies and four-quadrant biopsies in the detection of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

    • L Gossner, O Pech, A May, M Vieth, M Stolte, and C Ell.
    • Department of Medicine II, Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospitals (HSK), Wiesbaden (Medical School of the University of Mainz), Germany. liebwin.gossner@arcor.de
    • Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Oct 1; 38 (10): 724-9.

    BackgroundBarrett's oesophagus embodies the risk of malignant transformation. High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus are often discrete or macroscopically occult lesions and show a patchy distribution and therefore, directed biopsies in combination with four-quadrant random biopsies are the gold standard for surveillance.AimsThe aim of this prospective study was to compare methylene blue staining and random biopsies in patients with early Barrett's neoplasia.Patients And MethodsEighty-six patients (mean age 65+/-8 years) with histologically proven but macroscopically in evident high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n=17) or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus (n=69) on HR-endoscopy with all together 98 lesions, were included. In the first step, four-quadrant random biopsies were taken during routine endoscopy (group I). In a second step, staining was performed with a 0.5% solution of methylene blue with a spray catheter. Biopsies of focal areas with decreased stain, heterogeneity of stain or absence stain were taken (group II).ResultsIn 75/86 patients, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus could be diagnosed in the methylene blue group while 56 patients were determined in the random biopsies group (P=0.053). High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer was diagnosed in significantly more methylene blue-directed biopsies (80.9% versus 26.4%, P<0.005) and also significantly more lesions could be identified in the methylene blue group (96/98; 98%) while in the random biopsies group only 58/98 lesions (59%) could be localised (P<0.05). When methylene blue was used (1217 versus 562, P<0.0001), the average number of specimens taken with methylene blue per patient was about half of that with random biopsy (6.5 versus 14.1, P<0.0001).ConclusionsChromoendoscopy with methylene blue diagnosed significantly more patients and lesions with intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus compared to random biopsies. In addition, significantly less biopsies were needed with methylene blue compared to random biopsies. The use of methylene blue-directed biopsies appears to improve the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…