• Jiexian Liang, Tomoyuki Kawamata, and Wenjin Ji.
• Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China.
• Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood). 2010 Nov 1; 235 (11): 1300-5.

AbstractEndothelin-1 (ET-1) has recently been identified to evoke pruritus/itching sensation in both humans and animals. It is most likely that the signaling is through the specific G-protein-coupled ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, but the downstream signaling mediators for ET-1 remain elusive. In the present study, we examined the potential involvement of several distinct signaling molecules in ET-1-induced pruritus in a murine model. We applied an in vivo pruritus model in C57BL/6J mice by injecting ET-1 intradermally into the scruff, and recording the number of scratching bouts within 30 min after injection. Then specific antagonists/inhibitors for distinct signaling molecules, including cell-surface ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, histamine receptor type 1 (H1 receptor), protein kinases A (PKA) and C (PKC), phospholipase C (PLC) or adenylyl cyclase (AC), were co-injected with ET-1. The results showed that ET-1 induced a vigorous scratching response in mice in a dose-dependent manner. This response was further enhanced by a specific antagonist for ET(B) receptor, BQ-788, reduced by a specific antagonist for ET(A) receptor, BQ-123, and not affected by mepyramine, the specific inhibitor for H1 receptor. In addition, the scratching response was significantly reduced by inhibitors for PKC and AC, but was significantly enhanced by PLC inhibitor, while PKA inhibitors showed no effects in the ET-1-induced scratching response. Our data suggested that ET-1 may signal through the ET(A) receptor, AC and PKC pathway to induce pruritus sensation, while ET(B) receptor and PLC may antagonize the pruritus evoked by ET-1. These results may provide a basis for the future development of antipruritic therapy.

44 keywords...

hide…