• Pathology · Feb 1999

    CSF bacterial antigen detection tests offer no advantage over Gram's stain in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.

    • J Mein and G Lum.
    • Microbiological Laboratory, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory, Australia.
    • Pathology. 1999 Feb 1; 31 (1): 67-9.

    AbstractWhile bacterial antigen detection (BAD) tests have been used on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with success in the diagnosis of bacterial infection in developing countries, their value in the developed world has been recently questioned. In Darwin, Northern Territory (NT), there are good diagnostic resources but high rates of infectious disease, so it was unclear which findings were applicable to our own population. This study aimed to determine the utility of the BAD tests in detection of bacterial meningitis from CSF in patients studied at Darwin, using a retrospective review of hospital case records and microbiology laboratory reports, over a 19 month period, and utilising a clinical component in the case definition of bacterial meningitis. The sensitivity of the BAD test in the diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis was 28.6%, with a specificity of 98.7% and a positive predictive value of 85.7%. The cost per positive test was computed at $240. No cases of bacterial meningitis which were positive on the BAD test were missed on Gram's stain of CSF. We conclude that in our setting BAD tests alone are not sensitive enough to confidently diagnose bacterial meningitis. BAD tests are more costly and offer no advantage in speed of diagnosis or in antibiotic pre-treated patients, compared to routine Gram's stain.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.