-
- C Hirneiss, A S Neubauer, A Niedermeier, E M Messmer, M Ulbig, and A Kampik.
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Muenchen, Germany. Christoph.Hirneiss@med.uni-muenchen.de
- Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec 1; 113 (12): 2176-80.
PurposeCost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses are of increasing importance to clinicians and health policy experts. This study determines the costs in Germany and other countries in relation to gain of utility for patients with bilateral poor vision owing to corneal disease undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 1 eye.DesignA cost-utility analysis was performed using retrospective clinical data and high-level evidence-based data.ParticipantsSixty patients (mean age, 46.3 years) with bilateral poor vision who underwent PK for corneal disease.MethodsVisual acuity and utility values were obtained before and 1 year after PK and after suture removal. A 10-year graft survival rate of 80% was assumed. Expenses included costs for the corneal transplant and surgery, medication, and optical rehabilitation. A discount rate of 5% was applied for costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-utility analysis encompassed a 10-year period after surgery.Main Outcome MeasuresThe number of QALYs was calculated for the study group undergoing PK. This was divided into the cost of the procedure to get the number of euros spent per QALY gained.ResultsMedian binocular preoperative visual acuity was -log mean angle of resolution (-logMAR) 0.91+/-0.53 (Snellen equivalent 20/160) yielding a utility value of 0.67. After suture removal and optical rehabilitation, binocular visual acuity increased to median -logMAR 0.36+/-0.36 (20/46) with a utility value of 0.79. Over the 10 years after surgery and considering graft survival and discounting, a cost utility of 9551 euros per QALY was gained (equivalent to US11,557 dollars). One-way sensitivity analysis yielded a range from 7706 euros to 12874 euros per QALY, highlighting the robustness of the model.ConclusionsAlthough an expensive procedure, PK is cost effective in patients with bilateral poor vision.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.