• Jamie R Mitchell, Rozsa Sas, Daniel J Zuege, Christopher J Doig, Eldon R Smith, William A Whitelaw, John V Tyberg, and Israel Belenkie.
• Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, Alberta.
• Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jan 1; 21 (1): 73-81.

AbstractThe cardiac effects of positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure are incompletely understood. External constraint due to increased intrathoracic pressure decreases left ventricular end-diastolic volume; the effects on venous return and ventricular interaction are less clear. Phasic changes in inferior vena caval flow, end-diastolic ventricular dimensions and output were measured in seven anesthetized, ventilated normal dogs. During inspiration, caval flow, right ventricular diameter and output decreased; end-diastolic transseptal pressure gradient, septum-to-left ventricular free wall diameter, left ventricular area (ie, left ventricular volume index) and output increased despite the decreased sum of the septum-to-free wall diameters. The reverse occurred during expiration. Increased positive end-expiratory pressure decreased the left ventricular area, but the end-expiratory right ventricular diameter was unchanged. At given airway pressures, right ventricular diameter was greater at higher positive end-expiratory pressures, suggesting that a leftward septal shift (direct ventricular interaction) added to the effect of external constraint on left ventricular end-diastolic volume. In conclusion, positive pressure ventilation reduced right ventricular end-diastolic volume during inspiration and increased the transseptal pressure gradient, which shifted the septum rightward, increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume and output. The reverse occurred during expiration. Positive end-expiratory pressure constrained left ventricular filling and decreased left ventricular end-diastolic volume further by a leftward septal shift.

25 keywords...

hide…