-
Intensive care medicine · Jan 2008
Comparative StudyThe effect of epinephrine by nebulization on measures of airway obstruction in patients with acute severe croup.
- A C Argent, M Hatherill, C J L Newth, and M Klein.
- Division of Paediatric Critical Care and Children's Heart Disease, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa. andrew.argent@uct.ac.za
- Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan 1; 34 (1): 138-47.
ObjectivesTo demonstrate that tests of pulmonary function applicable to sick infants and small children with acute severe viral croup would provide clear, objective evidence of responsiveness to therapy with nebulized epinephrine.Study DesignOesophageal pressure changes and airflows at the mouth were measured in 17 patients with acute severe croup, before and after nebulization with epinephrine.ResultsIn 12 of the 17 patients there was a significant improvement in respiratory mechanics following epinephrine nebulization. Six of the 12 patients who responded to adrenaline also received 0.9% saline by nebulization, without improvement. No measures derived from combined flow and volume data showed any statistically significant change following epinephrine nebulization. Measures combining flow and pressure data, specifically inspiratory airway resistance, expiratory airway resistance, work of breathing, rate of work of breathing and volume for effort, showed changes of 26%, 33%, 16%, 16% and 46% respectively. The most statistically significant measures were pressure-rate product, pressure-time integral, oesophageal pressure alone and expiratory resistance. These changes persisted for at least 10 min after inhalation although there was some evidence of decline in pharmacologic effect at that time.ConclusionsNebulized epinephrine results in a short-lived improvement in some but not all patients with croup. This reduction in respiratory effort occurs secondary to a decline in inspiratory and expiratory airway resistance. Oesophageal pressures measured via a feeding tube are satisfactory for quantification of the acute response and may be a useful continuous monitoring device. Flow measurements are unhelpful, and continuous administration of nebulized epinephrine should be investigated.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.