• Clifford B Jones and Debra L Sietsema.
• Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Michigan State University, 230 Michigan Street NE, Suite 300, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA. Clifford.Jones@oamichigan.com
• Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011 Dec 1; 469 (12): 3379-89.

BackgroundOperative indications for displaced scapular fractures have been controversial and inconsistent. Surgeons have been dissuaded to operate on these uncommon fractures because of the complex anatomy, approaches, and fracture patterns. It is unclear whether return to work, pain, or complications differ in patients with scapular fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively.Questions/PurposesWe therefore assessed differences in rates of union, range of motion, ability to return to work, pain, and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular body and neck fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 182 patients with 182 scapular fractures treated between 2002 and 2005. Of the 182 fractures, 31 were treated with open reduction internal fixation and matched by age, occupation, and gender to 31 patients treated nonoperatively. The proportions of AO/OTA fracture types were similar in the two groups. The mean displacement, shortening, and angulation were greater in the operative group as compared with the nonoperative group. All patients were followed until healing or discharge from care (average, 1.5 years; range, 14-32 months). We assessed complications, return to work, and radiographic healing.ResultsAll fractures healed. We found no differences in return to work, pain, or complications.ConclusionsOur observations suggest operative treatment of displaced scapula fractures results in similar healing, return to work, pain, and complications as nonoperative treatment. We do not recommend operating on any scapular neck or body fractures displaced less than 20 mm.Level Of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

30 keywords...

hide…