• Stroke · Jan 1995

    Crossed cerebellar diaschisis and brain recovery after stroke.

    • B Infeld, S M Davis, M Lichtenstein, P J Mitchell, and J L Hopper.
    • Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
    • Stroke. 1995 Jan 1; 26 (1): 90-5.

    Background And PurposeAlthough crossed cerebellar diaschisis is well recognized after stroke, there is controversy concerning its clinical correlations and serial changes, and little is known about its prognostic value.MethodsWe studied crossed cerebellar diaschisis and cerebral hypoperfusion in 47 patients with acute middle cerebral cortical infarction using 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime and single-photon emission computed tomography within 72 hours of stroke onset. Thirty-one of these patients had outcome studies at 3 months; 15 of the 31 underwent an additional scan after acetazolamide injection. Tissue loss was determined with computed tomography, performed at outcome in 28 patients. Clinical stroke severity was assessed with the Canadian Neurological Scale and Barthel Index. Cerebellar blood flow asymmetry was studied in 22 healthy, age-matched control subjects.ResultsCerebellar blood flow asymmetry was significant in patients (mean +/- SE, 9.76 +/- 0.78%; P < .001) but not in control subjects (-0.22 +/- 0.56%). Crossed cerebellar diaschisis was strongly associated with infarct hypoperfusion volume at both acute (regression coefficient +/- SEb, b = 6.76 +/- 0.65; P < .001) and outcome stages (b = 6.13 +/- 0.63; P < .001). Cross-sectionally over the first 72 hours, infarct hypoperfusion volume decreased by 2% for each hour from onset (P < .05), while crossed cerebellar diaschisis remained unchanged. Canadian Neurological Scale score at the acute stage was negatively associated with acute crossed cerebellar diaschisis (b = -0.10 +/- 0.05; P < .05) after allowing for infarct hypoperfusion volume. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis did not change between acute-stage, outcome, and postacetazolamide scans. Acute-stage crossed cerebellar diaschisis predicted outcome Barthel Index score (b = -0.28 +/- 0.14; P = .05) and tissue loss (b = 3.81 +/- 0.96; P < .001) but was no longer an independent prognostic factor after allowing for acute-stage infarct hypoperfusion volume.ConclusionsThis study shows that crossed cerebellar diaschisis is a functional phenomenon that correlates with both stroke severity and infarct hypoperfusion volume and persists despite neurological recovery. Although acute-stage crossed cerebellar diaschisis has no prognostic value independent of acute-stage hypoperfusion volume, it might indicate the proportion of nutritional to nonnutritional perfusion at the infarct site and hence be useful in the evaluation of reperfusion therapies in the acute stage.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.