• Heart Rhythm · Mar 2012

    Evaluation of a new standardized protocol for the perioperative management of chronically anticoagulated patients receiving implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices.

    • Oscar Cano, Begoña Muñoz, David Tejada, Joaquín Osca, María-José Sancho-Tello, José Olagüe, José E Castro, and Antonio Salvador.
    • Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain. cano_osc@gva.es
    • Heart Rhythm. 2012 Mar 1; 9 (3): 361-7.

    BackgroundPerioperative management of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients receiving pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators remains an issue of concern.ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the safety and the effect on the hospital length of stay of a new standardized protocol for perioperative management of OAC in this setting.MethodsThe new standardized protocol classified patients according to a renewed evaluation of their thromboembolic (TE) risk. Briefly, patients were considered at moderate-to-high TE risk if they had a mechanical valvular prostheses irrespective of type and location or atrial fibrillation associated with a CHADS(2)score of ≥2, mitral stenosis or previous stroke, and underwent device implantation without stopping OAC (OAC continued, n = 129). Complete interruption of OAC before surgery was performed in low-TE-risk patients (OAC interrupted, n = 82). A retrospective cohort of patients managed with a classic heparin-bridging strategy served as a control group, with 62 patients considered at moderate-to-high TE risk according to previous guidelines (receiving pre- and postoperative low-molecular-weight heparin) and 146 considered at low TE risk (receiving only low doses of postoperative low-molecular-weight heparin).ResultsTE events were comparable between the 2 strategies. Patients entering the new standardized protocol had significantly lower rates of pocket hematoma (2.3% for OAC continued vs 17.7% for moderate-to-high TE risk bridging controls, P = .0001, and 0% for OAC interrupted vs 13% for low-TE-risk bridging controls, P <.0001) and shorter hospital stays. A mean of 3.34 hospitalization days per patient were saved with the new standardized protocol, with an estimated cost savings of €850.83 per patient.ConclusionsImplantation of the new standardized protocol resulted in a significant reduction in bleeding complications and hospital stays, with adequate protection against TE events and significant cost savings.Copyright © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.