• Ana Tejedor, Eva Rivas, Jose Ríos, Ebymar Arismendi, Graciela Martinez-Palli, Salvadora Delgado, and Jaume Balust.
• Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: ana.tejedor@hotmail.com.
• J Crit Care. 2015 Jun 1;30(3):562-6.

PurposeOur goal was to assess the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) by the FloTrac/Vigileo (CO(V)) device in comparison with thermodilution technique through pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC(TD)) in morbidly obese patients.Material And MethodsCardiac output in 8 morbidly obese patients was assessed twice at upright and lying position breathing ambient air. At least 4 consecutive CO measurements with 10 mL of ice-cold saline injections were performed each time. Simultaneous CO measurements were recorded with both single-bolus thermodilution and CO(V).ResultsOne hundred thirty-two CO data pairs were collected. The overall mean single-bolus thermodilution 6.2 ± 1.1 L/min was lower than the overall mean CO(V) 7.8 ± 1.6 L/min (P < .001). Lin concordance coefficient indicated that overall agreement between PAC(TD) and CO(V) was poor, 0.29. Lin concordance coefficient in sitting position was 0.29, 95% confidence interval (0.17-0.40) and in lying position was 0.30, 95% confidence interval (0.15-0.44). The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed systematically higher values from CO(V) in comparison with PAC(TD). These differences increased in presence of high CO measurements. In 3 of 8 patients, the percentage error was lower than 20%, whereas in the other 5, it was higher than 20%. Of these 5, in 2 cases, the percentage error was greater than 50%.ConclusionData obtained using CO(V) vs PAC(TD) measurements showed poor correlation. The results were not interchangeable.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…