-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Aug 2002
Clinical Trial[Evaluation of the UpsherScope laryngoscope in routine intubation with no expected difficulties].
- A Andueza Artal, C Rivera Gaitero, C Trigo Domínguez, J Gómez-Arnau Díaz-Cañabate, and S García del Valle Manzano.
- Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, C/Budapest, 1. 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid.
- Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2002 Aug 1; 49 (7): 350-5.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the new rigid, fiberoptic laryngoscope (UpsherScope) in cases with no expectation of intubation difficulty.Material And MethodsWe studied 130 ASA I-II patients for whom no difficulty with tracheal intubation was predicted. Intubation attempts were undertaken by three staff anesthesiologists, with up to three tries permitted per patient. Causes of difficulty were recorded. A regression study of the number of tries per patient over the course of the study was used to identify a possible learning effect. Causes related to inexperience were identified by comparing their frequency of appearance between the first and second halves of the study using a chi-squared test.ResultsNinety-nine patients (76%) were intubated, 70 of them (54%) on the first try. A total of 223 attempts at laryngoscopy (1.71 +/- 0.85) per patient) were made. The best relation in the regression analysis was linear, with a significant slope (-0.0193, p < 0.05) and R2 = 0.103 demonstrating a learning effect. The reasons for difficulty were hitting the endotracheal tube (ETT) against the right arytenoids (18), esophageal progression of the ETT (12), blood or secretions (8), vision obstructed by the epiglottis (7), clouding (7), lateral sliding of the stylet (6), hitting the ETT against the epiglottis (4). Only ETT impingement of the right arytenoids was related to inexperience (p < 0.001). We discuss the relation of these factors to the design of the laryngoscope.ConclusionsOur experience suggests that the UpsheScope does not offer advantages in routine intubations. The low success rate and the need for repeated attempts at intubation may be related to suboptimal design of the laryngoscope.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.