• David M Shahian, Lisa I Iezzoni, Gregg S Meyer, Leslie Kirle, and Sharon-Lise T Normand.
• Center for Quality and Safety and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. dshahian@partners.org
• Am J Med Qual. 2012 Mar 1; 27 (2): 112-23.

AbstractHospital-wide mortality rates are used as a measure of overall hospital quality. However, their parsimony and apparent simplicity belie significant conceptual and methodological concerns. For many diagnoses included in hospital-wide mortality, the association between short-term mortality and quality of care is not well established. Furthermore, compared with condition-specific or procedure-specific mortality, hospital-wide mortality rates pose greater methodological challenges (ie, eligibility and exclusion criteria, risk adjustment, statistical techniques for aggregating across diagnoses, usability). Many of these result from substantial interprovider heterogeneity in diagnosis frequency, sample sizes, and patient severity. Hospital-wide mortality is problematic as a quality metric for public reporting, although hospitals may elect to use such measures for other purposes. Potential alternative approaches include multidimensional composite metrics or mortality measurement limited to selected conditions and procedures for which the link between hospital mortality and quality is clear, legitimate exclusions are uncommon, and sample sizes, end points, and risk adjustment are adequate.

12 keywords...

hide…