• P Dailland, P Chaussis, J Landru, and H Belkacem.
• Unit_é d' Anesthésie-Réanimation Obstétricale, Maternité de port-Royal, Paris.
• Cah Anesthesiol. 1996 Jan 1; 44 (2): 127-43.

AbstractSince the last decade, lumbar epidural analgesia has gained widespread use in obstetrics. Approximately 80% of parturients receive epidural analgesia for labour and vaginal delivery as well as caesarean section in most centres. There is little doubt that the most successful application of epidural analgesia during labour, considered by more than 75% of primiparas as extremely painful. The quality of analgesia is far superior to that which can be achieved by either parenteral or inhalation approaches and, unlike these methods, the mother remains alert. Epidural analgesia also prevents, or greatly diminishes, most of the physiological and chemical responses to labour pain that can be considered as stress responses, similar to those that have been described during surgery. There are considerable benefits, therefore, to both mother and child. Thus, epidural analgesia usually can be extended to relieve both uterine pain and pain related to distension of the lower birth canal, as well as providing analgesia for forceps delivery or caesarean section. Epidural analgesia allows the mother to be awake, minimizes or completely avoids the problems of maternal aspiration and avoids neonatal drug depression from general anaesthetics. If the most popular indication for epidural analgesia is the provision of pain relief, there are certain complications of pregnancy in which epidural analgesia appears to be indicated on therapeutic grounds such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, breech delivery, multiple pregnancy, incoordinate uterine action and fetal and/or maternal medical complications.

18 keywords...

hide…