• R A Dicker, K H Sartorelli, W J McBrids, and D W Vane.
• Department of Surgery, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, USA.
• J. Pediatr. Surg. 1996 Aug 1; 31 (8): 1189-91; discussion 1191-3.

AbstractNonoperative management has become widely accepted as the standard of care for patients with blunt hepatic trauma. Recent studies among adults have supported the use of nonoperative management of selective penetrating wounds to the hepatic bed in stable patients. The therapeutic management of children with penetrating injuries to the hepatic bed were evaluated to ascertain whether nonoperative management was a reasonable consideration in their care. The database of the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (NPTR) was reviewed for the period 1985-1994. ICD-9 codes 864.00 to 864.10 were used to select injury site, diagnosis, and, combined with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code data, to ascertain therapeutic interventions. The NPTR is a compilation of data from 61 pediatric trauma centers, currently held at Tufts University. The charts of 29,000 children were reviewed; of these, 1,147 sustained hepatic injuries, 132 (12%) of whom had a penetrating injury. The mechanism of injury was gunshot wound in 100 patients (76%) and stab wound in 32 (24%). The mean age of the children who had a penetrating injury was 12.7 years (range, in utero to 19 years). Six children were managed nonoperatively (5%), and 20 (15%) had negative laparotomy findings. Overall, 106 children sustained additional injuries that required surgical repair. There were 50 hollow viscous injury repair, 19 diaphragmatic repairs, 5 nephrectomies, 4 splenectomies, 4 pancreatic resections, and 43 significant hepatic repairs. The overall mortality rate was 9.8% (13 deaths). Nine of these patients died within 24 hours of injury. These data indicate that penetrating injury to the hepatic bed in children is associated with a high percentage of other organ injuries that require surgical intervention. This seems to be in direct contrast with the findings for adults, for whom the hepatic mass appears protective because of its larger size. The close anatomic proximity of the organs in a child's abdomen appears to make surgical intervention necessary for the majority of children with penetrating injury to the hepatic bed, and indicates that this approach should remain the standard of care for pediatric patients.

26 keywords...

hide…