• Brain research · Dec 1997

    Spinal modulation of the induction of central sensitization.

    • R J Traub.
    • Department of Oral and Craniofacial Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore 21201, USA. rjt001@dental3.ab.umd.edu
    • Brain Res. 1997 Dec 5; 778 (1): 34-42.

    AbstractPeripheral tissue injury results in a change in the excitability of spinal dorsal horn neurons, central sensitization, and the behavioral correlate, hyperalgesia. It is proposed here that a dynamic balance exists between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input to the spinal dorsal horn that functions to prevent central sensitization following brief, mild, noxious stimulation. Following more severe stimulation and injury, there is a loss of these inhibitory mechanisms that allow central sensitization to proceed. Single-unit recordings were made from L4-L5 deep dorsal horn neurons (wide dynamic range and nociceptive specific) from barbiturate-anesthetized rats that were non-inflamed or had a carrageenan-inflamed hindpaw. Baseline test responses to mechanical stimuli were obtained and normalized to 100%. An electrical conditioning stimulus (1 Hz, 20 s, C-fiber strength) was applied to the tibial nerve or the neuronal receptive field. Five seconds later the test stimulus was repeated and the magnitude of response compared to baseline. During the conditioning stimulus, 46% of the neurons from non-inflamed and inflamed rats showed wind-up although the magnitude of wind-up was significantly greater for inflamed rats. The remaining neurons showed no change (36-46%) or wind-down (8-18%). Five seconds following the end of the conditioning stimulus 67% of the neurons from non-inflamed rats had attenuated responses to mechanical stimuli (36% of baseline). The remaining neurons were either unaffected (30%) or facilitated (3%). Following inflammation significantly fewer neurons (28%) had attenuated responses and the magnitude of attenuation was significantly less than in non-inflamed rats (54% of baseline). The responses of the remaining neurons were unaffected (54%) or facilitated (18%). During subsequent test stimuli, the responses of 30% of the neurons from non-inflamed rats were facilitated to 140% of baseline. The responses of 46% of neurons from inflamed rats were facilitated to 160% of baseline. In these neurons there was significantly less initial attenuation following inflammation compared to non-inflamed rats. The response of the neuron during the electrical conditioning had no effect upon the response following conditioning. The conditioning stimulus given transcutaneously within the receptive field produced qualitatively similar results to tibial nerve stimulation. In non-inflamed rats, when the conditioning/test-stimulus interval was increased from 5 s to 10-30 s, the responses of 20% of the neurons were attenuated (compared to 67%) and the mean magnitude of attenuation was 52% of baseline (compared to 36% of baseline). However, the responses of only 33% of the neurons were ultimately facilitated (compared to 30%). The present study documents a short period following a low-frequency C-fiber input in which the response to natural stimuli is suppressed. It is suggested that this attenuation, whether or not expressed, prevents a significant portion of deep dorsal horn neurons from becoming sensitized to C-fiber input. This functions to prevent central sensitization when the noxious stimulus does not produce inflammation and it is not beneficial to the animal to become hyperalgesic (i.e., to alter its behavior in order to protect an injured limb and reduce painful sensations). Following injury-producing tissue damage and inflammation the mechanisms that produce the attenuation are reduced, with a concomitant increase in excitation to electrical and natural stimuli, suggesting that the attenuation is inhibitory modulation of nociceptive input and injury results in a disinhibition producing an increase in excitability and central sensitization.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.