-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.
- Praveen Kumar Pandey, Inder Pawar, Jyoti Gupta, and Raaghav Rai Verma.
- Department of Orthopaedics, ESI-PGIMSR Model Hospital, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
- Spine. 2017 Jan 1; 42 (1): E41E49E41-E49.
Study DesignA single-center, prospective comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes, with a minimum 12 months follow-up.ObjectivesThe primary purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) in comparison with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level cervical disc degenerative disease, prospectively.Summary Of Background DataCTDR has recently been an alternative to ACDF in cervical disc degenerative disease to preserve the motion at the treated level.MethodsThis study included 34 patients, who underwent either single-level ACDF (n = 17) or single-level CTDR (n = 17) at C3 to C7 level for cervical disc degenerative disease between July 2012 to April 2014 with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.ResultsNeck disability index, visual analog scale, and neck-arm pain score showed significant difference between the two groups at final follow-up of 12 months. Modified orthopedic association score and Nurick scale also showed the Japanese significant difference between the two groups at final follow-up of 12 months. Odom criteria were not statistically significant between the two groups at final follow-up. The changes in overall cervical sagittal angle (CSA) were significantly different between the two groups. The segmental angle (SA) was maintained at a significantly higher value in the CTDR group than in the ACDF group during the follow-up period (P < 0.05). The range of motion of the cervical spine and the treated level was well maintained and improved in the CTDR group as compared with ACDF group and showed extremely statistically significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionCTDR was found to be a safe, effective, better, and efficient alternative to the traditional ACDF. CTDR using Prestige LP cervical disc provided a statistically significant clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes between the two groups after 1-year follow-up.Level Of Evidence2.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.