• Acta Paediatr Scand · May 1979

    Comparative Study

    Quality of care: a tracer diagnosis study of acute otitis media, comparing a district paediatric service with paediatric and otolaryngology emergency departments.

    • P Olin, P Bolme, G Ewert, B Lagerkvist, G Sterky, K Tengvald, and R Zetterström.
    • Acta Paediatr Scand. 1979 May 1; 68 (3): 305-13.

    AbstractAcute otitis media was used as a tracer condition for comparing patient care as regards patient satisfaction, compliance and medical outcome in a district paediatric office, an otolaryngological and a paediatric hospital emergency department. The initial work-up of the 216 patients studied at the three units was in good agreement with predefined standards. However, while the district paediatrician arranged a follow-up for all patients, the hospitals did so only in 10--30% of the visits. Parent satisfaction was significantly higher at the district office when the time spent waiting and the time the patient was with the doctor were kept constant. Urinary penicillin was not detected in 1/17 of district paediatric and in 6/19 of otological patients. Compliance with follow-up was also much higher at the district paediatrician. Medical outcome did not differ between the units. The majority of the parents expressed preference for the type of care given in a neighbourhood service. It is suggested that the criteria for adequate treatment of acute otitis media adapted for emergency departments may be revised in case easy access is provided to a medical centre offering continuity of care and proper follow-up. Studies of the quality of care have so far not managed to demonstrate a definite and positive relationship between the process of care, patient satisfaction and final medical results.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…