-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A prospective, randomised study comparing the efficacy of talc slurry and bleomycin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions.
- M Noppen, J Degreve, M Mignolet, and W Vincken.
- Respiratory Division, Academic Hospital AZ-VUB, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
- Acta Clin Belg. 1997 Jan 1; 52 (5): 258-62.
AbstractIn comparative studies with other agents, insufflated talc has been shown to be the most effective agent in achieving chemical pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusions. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of talc administered as slurry (5 g in 50 mL saline) via tube thoracostomy with that of bleomycin (1 mg/kg in 50 mL saline) (which is the most effective agent other than talc). In a randomised, prospective comparative study, twenty-six consecutive patients with proven malignant pleural effusions (recurrent after at least two pleuroscenteses) in whom no pleurodesis attempt had yet been made, and who were symptomatic, had a Karnovski index < or = 50, and an expected survival of one year or less, were included. Therapeutic failure was defined as recurrent pleural fluid > or = 50% of initial volume or requiring pleurocentesis. Recurrence rates (25% vs 21.4%, NS), fever (25% vs 35.7%, NS), pain (0% both groups) and survival (3.75 +/- 3 vs 5.82 +/- 7.15 months, NS) did not differ between bleomycin or talc treated patients. There were no major complications (e.g., empyema) or side-effects. In conclusion, talc slurry and bleomycin are equally effective in achieving chemical pleurodesis via thoracostomy in patients with malignant pleural effusions, and the safety profile of both agents is similar. Since talc is substantially less expensive than bleomycin, talc slurry probably represents the agent of choice for chemical tube thoracostomy pleurodesis.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.