• E Mortier, M Struys, L Versichelen, and G Rolly.
• University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Gent, Belgium.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1999 Jan 1; 50 (3): 119-23.

AbstractContemporary multigas analyzers determine anesthetic gas concentrations using (near) infrared analysis at either 3.3 or 8-9 microns. Methane also absorbs infrared light at 3.3 microns, but not at 8-9 microns. Consequently, erroneous anesthetic agent readings may result when methane is present in the circuit (e.g. during closed circuit anesthesia), potentially compromising patient safety. We have analyzed in laboratory conditions the influence of different known methane concentrations (100, 500 and 1000 ppm) on the gas-analysis readings provided by some clinical monitoring devices that use infrared absorption for the measurement of inhalation anesthetic concentration. At 3.3 microns wavelength the influence on the measurement of halothane was important, whereas the influence on that of enflurane and isoflurane was less pronounced. For desflurane and sevoflurane measurements, the influence of methane at 3.3 microns wavelength proved to be minimal. At higher wavelengths (8-9 microns) no influence of methane could be demonstrated.

8 keywords...

hide…