-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
- M Madeo, C Martin, and A Nobbs.
- Public Health Laboratory, Hull Royal Infirmary, England.
- J Intraven Nurs. 1997 Sep 1; 20 (5): 253-6.
AbstractPatients with an intravenous catheter on a cardiology unit were prospectively randomized to receive a transparent polyurethane dressing (N = 49) or sterile gauze (N = 31) dressing to compare security of fixation, dressing condition, skin condition, and rates of inflammation. The mean age of patients was 63 years of age (standard deviation, 12.57), and the average length of cannulation was 18 hours. The only significant difference between the two groups was the dressing condition in the transparent group was significantly better (P = 0.006) than that of the gauze group. The results suggest that gauze dressing may be a viable option to cover i.v. exit sites for patients requiring short-term cannulation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..