• Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi · Jul 2006

    Comparison of clinical outcomes between two methods of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in adult spondylolisthesis.

    • Yusheng Dou, Dingjun Hao, Shiming Wen, and Baorong He.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, the Red Cross Hospital of Xi'an, Xi' an Shaanxi, PR China.
    • Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jul 1; 20 (7): 743-6.

    ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation and autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolisthesis.MethodsFrom March 2003 to March 2004, twenty-seven patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were divided in two groups. In group A, 15 patients were treated by PLIF using simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation, including 4 males and 11 females, aging 53-68 years. Isthmic defects were located at L4 in 9 cases, at L5 in 6 cases. Four patients were smokers. The preoperative mean disc space height was 5.4 +/- 2.3 mm, the mean percentage of slip was 36.8% +/- 7.2%. In group B, 12 patients were treated by PLIF using autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixation, including 3 males and 9 females, aging 56 years. Isthmic defects were located at L4 in 8 cases, at L5 in 4 cases. Five patients were smokers. The preoperative mean disc space height was 5.7 +/- 2.5 mm, the mean percentage of slip was 37.8% +/- 6.2%. Two groups were compared in the amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, back pain, radiating pain, fusion rate, the intervertebral disc space height, the postoperative degree of slip and the fusion rate.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 24-38 months. The mean follow-up was 29 (24-36) months in group A and 26 (24-38) months in group B. There were no statistically significant differences in follow-up period, age, sex, the location of isthmic defects, smoking, the preoperative disc space height and the percentage of slip between two groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, the fusion time between two groups (P > 0.05). But there were statistically significant differences in the back pain score, the radiating pain score and the fusion rate between two groups (P < 0.05). The postoperative disc space height and the degree of slip of the last follow-up were 5.8 +/- 2.2 mm and 25.6% +/- 7.2% in group A, 6.2 +/- 2.5 mm and 24.1% +/- 7.4 % in group B, showing statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe PLIF using autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixations is more beneficial to improving the fusion rate and preventing longterm instabilities than simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolisthesis.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…