• Injury · Jul 2015

    The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of implant-related infections of the tibia: A case series.

    • S Shemesh, Y Kosashvili, D Groshar, H Bernstine, E Sidon, N Cohen, T Luria, and S Velkes.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 39 Jabotinski St., Petach Tikva 49100, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. Electronic address: shemesh.shai@gmail.com.
    • Injury. 2015 Jul 1; 46 (7): 1377-82.

    BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) combined with Computerised Tomography (CT) is gaining ground in clinical settings due to its added value of combined metabolic and anatomical imaging. PET/CT has shown promising results in diagnosing both acute and chronic infection of the axial and appendicular skeleton. PET imaging has an advantage in patients with metallic implants because FDG uptake, in contrast to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and standard computed tomography (CT), is not hampered by metallic artifacts. The role of PET/CT in the evaluation of implant-related infections involving the tibia in particular has not been thoroughly studied.PurposeTo investigate the usefulness of 18-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and treatment of implant-related infections of the tibia following osteosynthesis.MethodsWe reviewed 10 patients who underwent internal fixation to the tibia following trauma (4 open fractures, 6 closed fractures) and presented later with clinical signs of a possible implant-related infection. In evaluating the patients we used standard work-up methods (standard radiographs, lab tests) as well as advanced imaging techniques (PET/CT) in order to confirm the diagnosis and decide upon the preferred treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were then calculated for PET/CTs ability to predict presence of infection using intraoperative cultures as the gold standard.ResultsPET/CT validated our working diagnosis 9 out of 10 patients. In particular, it helped distinguish between: infected nonunion (n=4), aseptic nonunion (n=1), soft tissue infection (n=2) and chronic osteomyelitis (n=3). The overall sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT for identifying an osseous infection were 85.7% and 100%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 75%, respectively.ConclusionPET/CT is a promising imaging modality that can aid in the work up of patients with suspected implant-related infections of the tibia following osteosynthesis, and may be used as a supportive measure in clinical decision making.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.