• Anaesth Intensive Care · May 1985

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial

    A comparative study of techniques of postoperative analgesia following caesarean section and lower abdominal surgery.

    • P Brownridge and D B Frewin.
    • Anaesth Intensive Care. 1985 May 1; 13 (2): 123-30.

    AbstractA double-blind, within-patient trial was carried out to compare intramuscular pethidine 100 mg, epidural pethidine 50 mg and epidural bupivacaine 25 mg for pain relief on the day after caesarean section or lower abdominal gynaecological surgery. Analgesia was assessed on a visual analogue pain scale. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1.0) and venous plasma catecholamine levels were measured immediately before and approximately thirty minutes after each treatment. At the completion of the study the treatments were ranked in order of patient preference. Nineteen patients completed the trial. Analgesia provided by epidural pethidine 50 mg was superior to intramuscular pethidine 100 mg (p less than 0.05) but not statistically better than epidural bupivacaine. There was no significant difference in the duration of analgesia between the active treatments. A mean increase in FEV 1.0 of 18% occurred after both of the epidural treatments, but this did not achieve statistical significance. There was no significant change in catecholamine levels after any of the treatments. Epidural pethidine was preferred by patients over and above intramuscular pethidine and epidural bupivacaine (p less than 0.05).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…