• Andrew J Stoltze, Terrence S Wong, Karisa K Harland, Azeemuddin Ahmed, Brian M Fuller, and Nicholas M Mohr.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242.
• J Crit Care. 2015 Jun 1;30(3):495-501.

PurposeThe purposes of the study are to describe current practice of ventilation in a modern air medical system and to measure the association of ventilation strategy with subsequent ventilator care and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Materials And MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study of intubated adult patients (n = 235) transported by a university-affiliated air medical transport service to a 711-bed tertiary academic center between July 2011 and May 2013. Low tidal volume ventilation was defined as tidal volumes less than or equal to 8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Multivariable regression was used to measure the association between prehospital tidal volume, hospital ventilation strategy, and ARDS.ResultsMost patients (57%) were ventilated solely with bag valve ventilation during transport. Mean tidal volume of mechanically ventilated patients was 8.6 mL/kg predicted body weight (SD, 0.2 mL/kg). Low tidal volume ventilation was used in 13% of patients. Patients receiving low tidal volume ventilation during air medical transport were more likely to receive low tidal volume ventilation in the emergency department (P < .001) and intensive care unit (P = .015). Acute respiratory distress syndrome was not associated with prehospital tidal volume (P = .840).ConclusionsLow tidal volume ventilation was rare during air medical transport. Air transport ventilation strategy influenced subsequent ventilation but was not associated with ARDS.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…