-
Comparative Study
Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.
- Julio Urrutia, Tomas Zamora, Pablo Besa, Maximiliano Zamora, Daniel Schweitzer, and Ianiv Klaber.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Marcoleta 352, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: jurrutia@med.puc.cl.
- Injury. 2015 Jan 1; 46 (6): 1054-8.
IntroductionWe performed an agreement study of the AO and the Tronzo classifications of fractures of the trochanteric area to determine if they allow communication among practitioners with different levels of expertise.Material And MethodsComplete radiographs of 70 patients with trochanteric fractures were classified by nine evaluators (three hip sub-specialists, three orthopaedic surgery residents and three medical interns) using the AO and the Tronzo classifications. After a six-week interval, all cases were presented in a random sequence for repeat evaluation. The Kappa coefficient (k) was used to determine inter- and intra-observer agreement.ResultsInter-observer: considering the main AO fracture types, the agreement was moderate for sub-specialists (k = 0.60 [0.50-0.70]), residents (k = 0.58 [0.48-0.69]) and medical interns (k = 0.56 [0.45-0.69]). Using AO sub-types, all groups achieved fair agreement (sub-specialists: k = 0.31 [0.25-0.38]; residents: k = 0.32 [0.26-0.38]; medical interns: k = 0.30 [0.24-0.36]). For the Tronzo classification, sub-specialists (k = 0.56 [0.48-0.65]) and residents (k = 0.47 [0.39-0.55]) obtained moderate agreement; medical interns reached fair agreement (k = 0.33 [0.25-0.41]). Intra-observer: considering the main AO fracture types, sub-specialists (k = 0.79 [0.69-0.89]), residents (k = 0.71 [0.60-0.81]) and medical interns (k = 0.70 [0.59-0.82]) obtained substantial agreement. Considering AO sub-types, sub-specialists (k = 0.50 [0.45-0.56]) and medical interns (k = 0.54 [0.48-0.69]) achieved moderate agreement; residents (k = 0.39 [0.33-0.45]) achieved fair agreement. Using the Tronzo classification, all groups obtained substantial agreement (sub-specialists: k = 0.66 [0.58-0.74]; residents: k = 0.63 [0.55-0.71]; medical interns: k = 0.68 [0.60-0.76]).ConclusionThe AO classification allows an adequate communication when considering the main fracture types; the agreement within sub-types is not satisfactory. The Tronzo classification does not allow reliable communication between medical professionals.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.