• Eur. Respir. J. · Mar 2013

    Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests.

    • Paul D Robinson, Philipp Latzin, Sylvia Verbanck, Graham L Hall, Alexander Horsley, Monika Gappa, Cindy Thamrin, Hubertus G M Arets, Paul Aurora, Susanne I Fuchs, Gregory G King, Sooky Lum, Kenneth Macleod, Manuel Paiva, Jane J Pillow, Sarath Ranganathan, Sarah Ranganathan, Felix Ratjen, Florian Singer, Samatha Sonnappa, Janet Stocks, Padmaja Subbarao, Bruce R Thompson, and Per M Gustafsson.
    • Dept of Respiratory Medicine, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia. dr.pdrobinson@gmail.com
    • Eur. Respir. J. 2013 Mar 1; 41 (3): 507-22.

    AbstractInert gas washout tests, performed using the single- or multiple-breath washout technique, were first described over 60 years ago. As measures of ventilation distribution inhomogeneity, they offer complementary information to standard lung function tests, such as spirometry, as well as improved feasibility across wider age ranges and improved sensitivity in the detection of early lung damage. These benefits have led to a resurgence of interest in these techniques from manufacturers, clinicians and researchers, yet detailed guidelines for washout equipment specifications, test performance and analysis are lacking. This manuscript provides recommendations about these aspects, applicable to both the paediatric and adult testing environment, whilst outlining the important principles that are essential for the reader to understand. These recommendations are evidence based, where possible, but in many places represent expert opinion from a working group with a large collective experience in the techniques discussed. Finally, the important issues that remain unanswered are highlighted. By addressing these important issues and directing future research, the hope is to facilitate the incorporation of these promising tests into routine clinical practice.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…