-
- J M Baziomo, G Krim, O Kremp, L Leke, H Mahomedaly, A O'Cheik, F Eb, and B Risbourg.
- Unité de recherche mère-enfant (ER-DRED), CHU, Amiens, France.
- Arch Pediatr. 1995 Sep 1; 2 (9): 833-9.
BackgroundDefinitive diagnosis of a neonatal infection usually requires recovery of an etiologic agent from body fluids or tissues such as spinal fluid, blood and urine. Routine lumbar puncture (LP) may raise some problems in interpreting results.Population And MethodsA retrospective analysis of 1331 samples of CSF was made. LP had been performed on 1041 neonates including 569 prematures (54.6%) as a part of the evaluation for suspected bacterial infection.ResultsIn 50.7% of the cases, the CSF was haemorrhagic. The frequency of traumatic taps increased with the degree of prematurity, low birth weight, precocity of LP, association with respiratory distress and disorders of coagulating factors. In addition, haemorragic taps modified biochemical and cytologic characteristics of CSF. One hundred and six (8%) CSF samples contained organisms but the diagnosis of meningitis was certain in only 23 cases (2.2%). In the other 83 cases, CSF was thought to be contaminated, mostly by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Since both blood and CSF cultures were positive for the same bacterial organism in 18 cases, it was concluded that the LP had been useful in identifying the pathogens in only five cases. The high frequency of contaminated CSF led to overestimation of the incidence of true bacterial meningitis (0.57% in our study).ConclusionsThe low incidence of meningitis in neonates, the risk of having an haemorragic tap associated with the possibility of clinical aggravation during LP and the fact that the same pathogen is frequently (78.2% of cases) identified in blood cultures suggest that the immediate and routine LP is of less value than expected in infants suspected to be infected. LP could be postponed when the neonate presents with a respiratory distress syndrome and/or a precarious haemodynamic state.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.