-
J Diabetes Sci Technol · May 2011
Clinical TrialQuality of life and objective measures of diabetic neuropathy in a prospective placebo-controlled trial of ruboxistaurin and topiramate.
- Amanda Boyd, Carolina Casselini, Etta Vinik, and Aaron Vinik.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Strelitz Diabetes Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA. boydal@evms.edu
- J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1; 5 (3): 714-22.
BackgroundThe Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) is a validated comprehensive questionnaire designed to capture the entire spectrum of DN related to large fiber, small fiber, and autonomic neuropathy not captured in existing instruments. We aimed to determine if the Norfolk QOL-DN could be used to capture changes in QOL that correlate with nerve fiber-specific objective measures in a placebo-controlled trial of two agents that affect different nerve fibers.MethodsSixty patients with DN were allocated to treatment on ruboxistaurin (RBX) (n = 18), topiramate (TPX) (n = 18), or placebo (n = 18). QOL-DN was administered and objective measures of nerve function were performed at entry and end of the study period.ResultsTotal QOL scores improved significantly in the active treatment groups (RBX -9.56 ± 4.13; TPX -12.22 ± 2.76) but not in placebo (-5.56 ± 3.49). There were differences in nerve function improvement between treatments. Neurological symptom scores (NSS) improved with TPX from 5.5 (2.3) to 4.3 (0.65) (p = .007), sensory scores improved with TPX from 15.5 (1.79) to 8.3 (1.19) (p < .001), motor scores did not change, and sensory and motor impairment scores improved with TPX from 18.8 (2.15) to 12.1 (1.71) (p = .003). Total neuropathy scores (TNS) improved with TPX from 24.35 (2.61) to 16.35 (2.02) (p = .001). Neuropathy total symptom score-6 (NTSS-6) changes were significant for both treatments: RBX 4.38 (0.75) to 1.49 (0.38) (p < .001) and TPX 7.57 (1.3) to 4.26 (0.95) (p = .036). Changes in QOL-DN large fiber subscores correlated (Spearman's rank) significantly with changes in NTSS-6 (r = 0.55; p < .0001), NSS (r = 0.31; p < .04), neuropathy impairment score (NIS) (r = 0.35; p < .02), and TNS (r = 0.48; p < .0006). Changes in QOL-DN small fiber subscores correlated significantly with changes in NTSS-6 total scores (r = 0.40; p < .005) and intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (r = -0.29; p < .05).ConclusionRuboxistaurin produced significant improvement in large fiber measures while TPX produced significant changes in small fiber measures. The Norfolk QOL-DN tool differentiated between these changes captured in the fiber-specific domains. Correlations were found between objective measures of neuropathy and total QOL, but those with nerve fiber domain scores were modest and reinforce the need to quantify QOL as an endpoint in neuropathy independent of other measures.© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.