• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Apr 1996

    Preoperative evaluation of intubation conditions in patients scheduled for elective surgery.

    • J Jacobsen, E Jensen, T Waldau, and T D Poulsen.
    • Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Denmark.
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Apr 1; 40 (4): 421-4.

    AbstractPrediction of a difficult airway is a continuing problem. Several tests have been developed in order to overcome this problem. It has been proposed that using more than one test could increase the degree of predictability. One hundred patients scheduled for general surgery were successfully evaluated using three methods: 1. The size of the tongue in relation to the oral cavity (Mallampati gradation). 2. The thyromental and the mandibular length. 3. The atlanto-occipital angle. Seven patients had a difficult laryngoscopy and were difficult to intubate. It was possible to predict differenties in all seven patients, but it was found that only the Mallampati gradation and the atlanto-occipital angle contributed significantly to predictability. The cost of predicting further difficulties in all patients with a difficult laryngoscopy was a false positive prediction in a further 13 patients who had no problems with laryngoscopy or intubation. By increasing the specificity of the tests the number of false positive classifications could be reduced to 10 patients, but this would have led to the missing of one patient with a difficult laryngoscopy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.