-
Review Meta Analysis
Diagnostic accuracy of laser Doppler imaging in burn depth assessment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Jin Yong Shin and Hyung Suk Yi.
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical School of Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
- Burns. 2016 Nov 1; 42 (7): 1369-1376.
Background And ObjectiveAccurate assessment of burn depth is important for determination of treatment modality. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is known to be an objective and effective measurement tool in burn depth assessment. Our study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LDI across enrolled studies and subgroups.MethodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data from LDI cases were extracted from all primary studies and categorized into four cell values (true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives). Subgroup analyses were performed according to perfusion units of LDI, clinical criteria of superficial and deep burns during the treatment period, and publication date of enrolled studies.ResultsThe search strategy identified 321 publications. After screening, 10 articles were selected for review. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of LDI in all enrolled studies and subgroups were found to be similarly high. However, the sensitivity of LDI in our meta-analysis was not as high as that identified in previous studies.ConclusionAlthough LDI in burn depth assessment was identified as an accurate measurement tool in this meta-analysis, careful clinical assessment should be performed along with LDI in patients with deep burns.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.