• Daniel D Lydiatt.
• Section of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Nebraska Medical Center 98125, Omaha, NE 68198-1225, USA. dlydiatt@unmc.edu
• Am. J. Surg. 2004 Jun 1; 187 (6): 688-94.

BackgroundA litigation crisis exists in this country, and it may be better understood through analysis of lawsuits. Verdict summary analysis has been used for this purpose.MethodsNinety-nine jury verdict reviews from 1986 to 2001 were obtained from a computerized database. Reviews compiled data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, cancer cell types, sites, outcomes, and case summaries. Data was entered into a spreadsheet for analysis.ResultsFailure to diagnose was alleged in 54%; of these, 48% alleged biopsies were inappropriately omitted. Allegations were highest for failure to diagnose in dermatologists and general practice physicians, for misdiagnosis in pathologists, and for complications in surgeons. Young patients and those with poor outcomes received more and larger awards. Trauma appears to have support for a role in causation of skin cancer in some courts.ConclusionsThe study of skin cancer suits may help develop risk management and prevention strategies.

26 keywords...

hide…