• Srp Ark Celok Lek · Oct 2004

    [Surgery for coarctation of the aorta in infants younger than three months].

    • Slobodan Ilić, Irena Vuković, Djordje Hercog, Milan Vucićević, Voja Parezanović, Goran Vukomanović, Milan Djukić, Ida Jovanović, Slavko Simeunović, Vesna Lacković, and Vera Todorović.
    • Srp Ark Celok Lek. 2004 Oct 1; 132 Suppl 1: 27-33.

    IntroductionRecurrent coarctation is a complication which is seen at a consistent rate following repair for coarctation of the aorta in young infants.ObjectiveThis retrospective analysis was carried out to compare the results between resection with end-to-end anastomosis (ETE), and resection with extended end-to-end anastomosis (E-ETE), in this age group during late follow-up period. The role of ductus arteriosus is not clearly defined and the second objective of this study was to analyze intimal thickening in aortic coarctation.Material And MethodsFrom 1999 to 2003, 45 patients less than 3 months of age underwent repair of aortic coarctation. Mean age was 24 days (2-89 days), average weight was 3.5 +/- 0.6 kg (2.4-5.2 kg). The method of repair was ETE in 14 (31.1%) patients, E-ETE in 29 (64.4%) patients and other techniques were applied in 2 cases. Demographic, morphometric, clinical and operative variables were analyzed for correlation with recurrent arch obstruction. In order to characterize the components of intimal thickening in coarctation, narrowed segments of aorta resected from 16 neonates during surgery were examined immunocytochemically and by electron microscopy. For light microscopy, the specimens were dehydrated in graded ethanol (70-100%), cleared in xylol and embedded in paraffin. Immunocytochemical staining was performed in 5 microm sections from formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks, using a labeled streptavidin-biotin method with an LSAB kit (Dako).ResultsEarly mortality was 6.7% (CI 95%, 2.9%-10.4%). All early deaths (3 patients) occurred in infants with associated ventricular septal defects (p<0.05). The mean follow-up for all patients was 30 +/- 21 months (range 1.5-63 months). During mean follow-up of 2 months, recurrent arch obstruction was diagnosed in 9 patients (21.4%). Two patients with associated complex heart defects died before re-intervention, one had mild gradient on catheterization (20 mm Hg) and one is waiting for catheterization. Five patients were reoperated and the mean time to re-intervention was 4 months (range 2.6-6 months). Kaplan-Meier freedom from recoarctation was 78.1 +/- 6.4% at 5 years in the whole group. Freedom from recoarctation was 60.6 +/- 15.4% at 25 months in ETE group and 86.2 +/- 6.4% at 60 months in E-ETE group (p=0.062). Factors associated with recoarctation, obtained by univariable Cox regression, included abnormal right subclavian artery (p=0.003), hypoplastic proximal transverse aortic arch (Z < or = -2, p=0.025) and weight at operation < or = 3 kg (p=0.02). Abnormal origin of the right subclavian artery was the only independent predictor of recoarctation obtained by multivariable Cox regression analysis.DiscussionAll examined specimens had intimal thickening of the posterior aortic wall, with accumulation of smooth muscle cells (SMC) with alpha smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) and vimentin-immunoreactivity (but not desmin and MHC) and also expressed PCNA and S-100. In the inner media of the anteromedial wall of the aorta, all specimens had large number of SMC expressing desmin and MHC. SMC in the inner media exhibit contractile phenotype and their origin could be ductal.ConclusionBoth procedures are effective for coarctation repair in young infants. Risk of recoarctation is a function of the complex anatomy of the arch, while residual ductal tissue may play a significant role.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.