• Masui · Aug 1996

    [Epidural catheterization dose not meet our expectation].

    • M Miyazaki, K Takeda, H Ohsumi, K Takemoto, M Sugimoto, and H Tamura.
    • Department of Anesthesia, Osaka National Hospital.
    • Masui. 1996 Aug 1; 45 (8): 955-60.

    AbstractAccording to the roentgenographically confirmed intervertebral space at which an epidural catheter was placed, 241 patients who underwent abdominal or orthopedic hip surgery were allocated into 3 groups. Groups A, B, and C received epidural catheterization at Th7-10, Th10-L1, and L1-4, respectively. In each group, we examined the intervertebral space, which the anesthesiologist who had placed epidural catheter had determined, and the one which had been confirmed roentgenographically. We also investigated the catheter movement during the postoperative period. Catheters were barely placed at the same intervertebral space which had been confirmed roentgenographically. Considering the iliac crest as a landmark of L3-4 intervertebral space, the puncture point agreed with the roentgenographically confirmed intervertebral space with a percentage of 33 in group A. The extent of agreement increased up to 47 and 55 percent, in groups B and C, respectively. In contrast, when we counted down from the cervical prominent vertebra, a landmark of C7, the agreement was better in group A (55%) than in group C (33%). In the postoperative period, catheters came out more frequently in groups A and B than in group C, resulting from the early ambulation in abdominal surgery groups. There results suggest that, to place the epidural catheter more properly, (1) we should start to count from the landmark which is close to the puncture point and (2) we should keep it in mind that catheters come out accidently in patients who are encouraged to ambulate in the early postoperative period.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.