• L Cereser, D Bagatto, R Girometti, G Como, C Zuiani, and M Bazzocchi.
• Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Via Colugna 50, 33100, Udine, Italy. lcereser@sirm.org
• Radiol Med. 2011 Mar 1; 116 (2): 219-29.

PurposeThe authors evaluated the diagnostic yield of chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the proportion of other clinically relevant findings in a large cohort of consecutive inpatients and patients referred from the emergency department (outpatients).Materials And MethodsA total of 327 radiological reports of chest MDCT scans performed for suspected acute PE in 327 patients (158 men, 169 women; mean age 69 years, standard deviation 17.33 years; 233 inpatients, 94 outpatients) were retrospectively evaluated and classified into four categories: 1, positive for PE; 2, negative for PE but positive for other findings requiring specific and immediate intervention; 3, completely negative or positive for findings with a potential for significant morbidity requiring specific action on follow-up; 4, indeterminate. The distribution of findings by categories among the entire population and inpatients and outpatients separately was calculated (chi-square test, α=0.05).ResultsIn the entire population, the diagnostic yield (i.e. proportion of cases classified as category 1) was 20.2% (66/327). Proportions of cases classified as categories 2, 3 and 4 were 27.5% (90/327), 44.3% (145/327) and 7.9% (26/327), respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between inpatients and outpatients (p=0.193).ConclusionsIn patients with suspected acute PE, chest MDCT provides evidence of conditions requiring immediate and specific intervention (i.e. categories 1 and 2) in nearly 50% of cases, without differences between inpatients and outpatients.

17 keywords...

hide…