• R Bassan, M Scofano, R Gamarski, H F Dohmann, L Pimenta, A Volschan, M Araujo, C Clare, M Fabrício, C H Sanmartin, K Mohallem, S Gaspar, and R Macaciel.
• Hospital Pró-Cardíaco e PROCEP, Centro de Ensino e Pesquisas do Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro.
• Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2000 Jan 1; 74 (1): 13-29.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficiency of a systematic diagnostic approach in patients with chest pain in the emergency room in relation to the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the rate of hospitalization in high-cost units.MethodsOne thousand and three consecutive patients with chest pain were screened according to a preestablished process of diagnostic investigation based on the pre-test probability of ACS determinate by chest pain type and ECG changes.ResultsOf the 1003 patients, 224 were immediately discharged home because of no suspicion of ACS (route 5) and 119 were immediately transferred to the coronary care united because of ST elevation or left bundle-branch block (LBBB) (route 1) (74% of these had a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction [AMI]). Of the 660 patients that remained in the emergency room under observation, 77 (12%) had AMI without ST segment elevation and 202 (31%) had unstable angina (UA). In route 2 (high probability of ACS) 17% of patients had AMI and 43% had UA, whereas in route 3 (low probability) 2% had AMI and 7% had UA. The admission ECG has been confirmed as a poor sensitivity test for the diagnosis of AMI (49%), with a positive predictive value considered only satisfactory (79%).ConclusionA systematic diagnostic strategy, as used in this study, is essential in managing patients with chest pain in the emergency room in order to obtain high diagnostic accuracy, lower cost, and optimization of the use of coronary care unit beds.

27 keywords...

hide…