• Cardiovascular research · Apr 1995

    Preischaemic as well as postischaemic application of a calcium antagonist affords cardioprotection in the isolated guinea pig heart.

    • P Massoudy, B F Becker, C Seligmann, and E Gerlach.
    • Department of Physiology, University of Munich, Germany.
    • Cardiovasc. Res. 1995 Apr 1; 29 (4): 577-82.

    ObjectiveThe aim was to answer the following questions: (1) Does treatment with calcium antagonists have to be begun before ischaemia or is postischaemic application also protective? (2) When applied before ischaemia, do calcium antagonists have to depress preischaemic cardiac function in order to elicit protection? (3) Is cardioprotection a matter of improved reflow or do the agents influence the degree of oxidative injury during reperfusion?MethodsIsolated working guinea pig hearts underwent ischaemia (15 min) and reperfusion (15 min). The calcium antagonist gallopamil was given either before (0.1 nM and 1 nM) or after ischaemia (0.1 nM) during early reperfusion (first 5 min). Recovery was defined as postischaemic compared to preischaemic external heart work, expressed in percent. Oxidative stress was assessed by the release of glutathione (GSH). Lactate release served as a measure of the ischaemic challenge. The ability of gallopamil to scavenge oxygen radicals directly was investigated in an in vitro chemiluminescence assay.ResultsPump function of control hearts recovered to only 28% after reperfusion. Pretreatment with 0.1 and 1 nM gallopamil improved recovery to the same extent (48.7% and 43.4%, respectively); however, postischaemic application of 0.1 nM gallopamil afforded equal protection (45.4% recovery). Only the higher concentration of 1 nM gallopamil depressed preischaemic external heart work (by 11%). During earliest reperfusion (1-5 min), release of GSH only tended to be lower in treated hearts. During the subsequent minutes of reperfusion (5-15 min), release of GSH was significantly less in hearts postischaemically treated with 0.1 nM gallopamil (40 pmol.min-1 v 940 pmol.min-1 for controls). In contrast, ischaemia-induced lactate release did not differ between the groups. Gallopamil did not scavenge reactive oxygen species in vitro.ConclusionsShort term postischaemic application of the calcium antagonist gallopamil is almost as effective at restoring pump function as preischaemic application which, in turn, does not have to depress preischaemic cardiac function in order to elicit protection. A reduction of oxidative stress during reperfusion seems to contribute to the beneficial effects of postischaemic application of gallopamil, but a direct oxygen radical scavenging activity of gallopamil is not involved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.