• Robert J Buchanan, David Darrow, Daniel Monsivais, Zoltan Nadasdy, and Klevest Gjini.
• aDivision of Neurosurgery, Seton Brain and Spine Institute bDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin cNeuroTexas Institute, Austin dDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas eDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas fDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA gEotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary.
• Neuroreport. 2014 Jun 18; 25 (9): 715-7.

AbstractNeuropathic pain is a chronic condition lacking effective management and responding poorly to standard treatment protocols. Motor cortex stimulation has emerged as a new and promising therapeutic tool with outcomes potentially affected by the specific causes and location. In this study we report a series of eight cases in the neurosurgery practice of one of the authors (R.J.B.), including neuropathic pain syndromes of trigeminal or thalamic origin with or without anesthesia dolorosa. Pain relief was evaluated on the basis of comparison of Visual Analog scores at baseline and at 3 months after surgery. In addition, we assessed differences in pain relief outcomes between cases with trigeminal neuralgia and thalamic stroke, as well as cases with or without anesthesia dolorosa (i.e. pain with numbness of the affected area). Visual Analog Scale scores showed a statistically significant decrease of 4.19 (P=0.002) at 3 months follow-up compared with baseline. Pain relief levels in four of five patients in the subgroup with facial pain were higher than 50%, and none of the patients in the subgroup with thalamic and phantom limb pain showed such a good outcome. Furthermore, we found larger pain relief levels in facial pain conditions with versus without anesthesia dolorosa. These results point to utility of motor cortex stimulation in relieving neuropathic pain, as well as better outcomes for patients with facial pain and anesthesia dolorosa. Future studies should incorporate methods to noninvasively trial those patients who may benefit from surgical implantation to predict the outcomes and maximize their negative predictive value.

24 keywords...

hide…