-
- D Tincello, S White, and S Walkinshaw.
- University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, UK.
- BJOG. 2001 Aug 1; 108 (8): 853-7.
Objective1. To study computerised cardiotocograph parameters from women with type I diabetes; 2. to examine the significance of observed differences from the expected normal values.DesignProspective observational study in the third trimester of pregnancy.SettingThe medical antenatal clinic of a tertiary referral centre.PopulationTwenty-six women with type I diabetes mellitus with a singleton pregnancy.MethodsComputerised cardiotocograph recordings were made weekly from 28 to 39 weeks. Derived parameters were compared with the published figures for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. Details of maternal blood sugar, labour and delivery and neonatal outcome were recorded. Data were compared between groups according to the computerised analysis of the antenatal CTGs.ResultsOne-hundred and thirty-one recordings were made with a median of five per patient (range 1-12). 1 1.3% showed absent episodes of high variation compared with the expected value of 0.8%, a difference of 9.5% (95% CI 4.5-15.3). Differences in short term variation, basal heart rate, frequency of fetal movements and heart rate accelerations were also found which changed with gestation. Overall these changes represented a more immature form of fetal heart rate than that which would be expected. No relationship between the changes and adverse fetal outcome could be identified.ConclusionsSignificant differences exist in cardiotocographs in maternal type I diabetes compared with normal fetuses. The changes may represent a delay in fetal maturation. The analysis mode of the computer will register these as abnormal features, but there is no evidence that they are pathological. We would recommend that computerised analysis is not used to assess pregnancies complicated by maternal type I diabetes mellitus.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.