• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 2010

    Comparative Study

    Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function in rats after cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for long-term deficits.

    • H Mayumi Homi, Carla L Calvi, J Lynch, and Hilary P Grocott.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
    • J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2010 Apr 1; 24 (2): 293-9.

    Objective(S)Neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have been shown in both clinical and experimental settings. Although short-term outcome has been evaluated in rats, the assessment of neurocognitive dysfunction with long-term follow-up has not been reported in experimental CPB models. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of CPB on long-term neurocognitive function in the rat.DesignProspective, interventional study.SettingA university research laboratory.ParticipantsMale Sprague-Dawley rats.InterventionsSprague-Dawley rats were randomized to either CPB (n = 19) or sham-operated groups (n = 17). On days 3, 7, and 14 and at 6 weeks after surgery, the rats were submitted to standardized neurologic testing (Neuroscore). In addition, the animals underwent cognitive testing in the Morris water maze (MWM), including basic, probe, and reversal trial protocols during the first 19 postoperative days (short-term cognitive outcome) and then repeated 6 weeks after surgery (long-term cognitive outcome).Measurements And Main ResultsThe CPB group had worse Neuroscores (day 3, 5[2]; day 7, 7[2]; day 14, 5[1]; 6 weeks, 5[1]) compared with the sham group (day 3, 7[2]; day 7, 7[1]; day 14, 7[1]; 6 weeks, 7[1]) at all time points tested (p < 0.05). In the MWM, the CPB group showed both short-term and persistent long-term neurocognitive dysfunction.ConclusionsCompared with sham-operated controls, rats undergoing CPB showed worse neurologic and neurocognitive outcome early after surgery. Importantly, long-term deficits also persisted at 6 weeks after surgery.Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.