• A Steiner, B Walsh, R M Pickering, R Wiles, J Ward, J I Brooking, and Southampton NLU Evaluation Team.
• Departments of Geriatric Medicine and Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, Murray Building, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. steiner@cats.ucsc.edu
• BMJ. 2001 Feb 24; 322 (7284): 453-60.

ObjectivesTo compare post-acute intermediate care in an inpatient nurse-led unit with conventional post-acute care on general medical wards of an acute hospital and to examine the model of care in a nurse-led unit.DesignRandomised controlled trial with six month follow up.SettingUrban teaching hospital and surrounding area, including nine community hospitals.Participants238 patients accepted for admission to nurse-led unit.InterventionsCare in nurse-led unit or usual post-acute care.Main Outcome MeasuresPatients' length of stay, functional status, subsequent move to more dependent living arrangement.ResultsInpatient length of stay was significantly longer in the nurse-led unit than in general medical wards (14.3 days longer (95% confidence interval 7.8 to 20.7)), but this difference became non-significant when transfers to community hospitals were included in the measure of initial length of stay (4.5 days longer (-3.6 to 12.5)). No differences were observed in mortality, functional status, or living arrangements at any time. Patients in the nurse-led unit received significantly fewer minor medical investigations and, after controlling for length of stay, significantly fewer major reviews, tests, or drug changes.ConclusionsThe nurse-led unit seemed to be a safe alternative to conventional management, but a full accounting of such units' place in the local continuum of care and the costs associated with acute hospitals managing post-acute patients is needed if nurse-led units are to become an effective part of the government's recent commitment to intermediate care.

25 keywords...

hide…