• Surgery · May 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

    • A J McMahon, I T Russell, G Ramsay, G Sunderland, J N Baxter, J R Anderson, D Galloway, and P J O'Dwyer.
    • University Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.
    • Surgery. 1994 May 1; 115 (5): 533-9.

    BackgroundUpper abdominal surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and a concomitant reduction in pulmonary function and oxygen saturation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is said to result in less postoperative pain compared with open cholecystectomy.MethodsIn a pragmatic, randomized trial, postoperative pain, opiate analgesic consumption, oxygen saturation, and pulmonary function (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and peak expiratory flow rate) were assessed after laparoscopic (n = 67) and minilaparotomy (n = 65) cholecystectomy.ResultsCompared with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with lower linear analogue pain scores (median 40 vs 59, p < 0.001), lower patient-controlled morphine consumption (median 22 vs 40 mg, p < 0.001), a smaller reduction in postoperative pulmonary function (mean peak expiratory flow rate 64% of preoperative value vs 49%, p < 0.001), and better oxygen saturation (mean 92.9% vs 91.2%, p = 0.008).ConclusionsThis study confirms that the postoperative pain and pulmonary changes associated with upper abdominal surgery are significantly reduced by the laparoscopic technique. These findings suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy may result in a reduced risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.