• A Harti, K Mjahed, A Chlihi, A Lamine, M Laraki, L Barrou, K Ait Bahou, and M Benaguida.
• Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CH Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Maroc.
• Cah Anesthesiol. 1993 Jan 1; 41 (3): 217-20.

AbstractThe prevention of blood pressure fall during a conventional spinal anaesthesia effected with 20 mg (4 ml) of isobaric 0.5 p. 100 bupivacaine relies on the use of vascular filling and/or a vasoconstrictor. A randomized prospective study was performed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of these two treatments. 148 patients were included and divided into three groups. Group I (n = 50): 2.5 mg IV bolus of etilefrine followed by continuous infusion (0.35 mg.kg-1.h-1). Group II (n = 50): 30 ml.kg-1 infusion of saline isotonic solution for 90 min, with infusion rate according to blood pressure. Group III (n = 48) did not receive any preventive treatment. A blood pressure fall of more than 30% of the initial value was observed in 59 patients: 18% of the etilefrine group, 28% of the saline infusion group, 54% of the control group. This peculiar frequency of hypotension in the control group emphasizes the need of a preventive treatment. Haemodynamic changes were fewer and less important in the etilefrine group compared with the saline infusion group. No failure and a better tolerance in the vasoconstrictor group were also to be noticed. These clinical data suggest that etilefrine could meet satisfactorily the therapeutic requirements.

15 keywords...

hide…