• Andrew J Amack, Gary A Barber, Patrick C Ng, Thomas B Smith, and Michael D April.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, TX.
• Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jan 1; 69 (1): 12-17.

Study ObjectiveWe compare received minute volume with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed face mask among medics obtaining a 1-handed mask seal on a cadaver model.MethodsThis study comprised a randomized crossover trial of adult US Army combat medic volunteers participating in a cadaver laboratory as part of their training. We randomized participants to obtain a 1-handed mask seal during ventilation of a fresh unembalmed cadaver, first using either an intraoral airway device or conventional cuffed face mask. Participants obtained a 1-handed mask seal while a ventilator delivered 10 standardized 750-mL breaths during 1 minute. After a 5-minute rest period, they repeated the study with the alternative mask. The primary outcome measure was received minute volume as measured by a respirometer.ResultsOf 27 recruited participants, all completed the study. Median received minute volume was higher with the intraoral mask compared with conventional cuffed mask by 1.7 L (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.9 L; P<.001).ConclusionThe intraoral mask resulted in greater received minute volume received compared with conventional cuffed face mask during ventilation with a 1-handed mask seal in a cadaver model. The intraoral mask may prove a useful airway adjunct for ventilation.Copyright © 2016 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

9 keywords...

hide…