• J Spinal Disord Tech · Oct 2013

    Comparative Study

    Medium-term clinical results of microsurgical lumbar flavectomy that preserves facet joints in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of bilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach.

    • Kazuyoshi Nakanishi, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yoshinori Fujimoto, Teruaki Okuda, Naosuke Kamei, Toshio Nakamae, Bun-Ichiro Izumi, Ryo Ohta, Yuki Fujioka, and Mitsuo Ochi.
    • *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Programs for Applied Biomedicine, Division of Clinical Medical Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hiroshima General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
    • J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Oct 1; 26 (7): 351-8.

    Study DesignA retrospective study of medium-term results.ObjectiveTo describe a technique for posterior decompression using microsurgical lumbar flavectomy (MLF) without facetectomy, which is based on the anatomic features of the ligamentum flavum, and to examine the clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal spondylolisthesis with lower extremity symptoms rather than low back pain, who underwent this procedure by 2 different approaches.Summary Of Background DataPosterior decompression with fusion has been the optimal and standard operative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Alternatively, minimally invasive procedures have been used for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with favorable outcomes.MethodsA bilateral laminotomy (BL group) was performed on 44 consecutive patients, and bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach (BDU group) was performed on 23 consecutive patients. The mean follow-up period was 7.0 years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and recovery rate were obtained, and radiographic assessment was performed using plain radiograms on the lateral view while standing in flexion, neutral, and extension postures before surgery and at the final follow-up.ResultsThe Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at the final follow-up was improved in the BL and BDU groups, compared with that before MLF. The mean recovery rate was 72.4% and 68.4%, respectively. The mean % slip increased at the final follow-up, compared with that before surgery in both groups, except for the % slip in the extension posture in the BDU group. However, there was no significant difference in the dynamic % slip in the flexion-extension posture between before surgery and at the final follow-up.ConclusionsClinical and radiologic parameters were not significantly different between the 2 groups. This technique of MLF using either approach did not increase the dynamic % slip and showed favorable medium-term clinical results in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.