• Spine J · Sep 2014

    Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression.

    • Annemieke J H Verwoerd, Wilco C Peul, Sten P Willemsen, Bart W Koes, Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp, Abdelilah el Barzouhi, Pim A J Luijsterburg, and Arianne P Verhagen.
    • Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.verwoerd@erasmusmc.nl.
    • Spine J. 2014 Sep 1; 14 (9): 2028-37.

    Background ContextThe diagnosis of sciatica is primarily based on history and physical examination. Most physical tests used in isolation show poor diagnostic accuracy. Little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of history items.PurposeTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of history taking for the presence of lumbosacral nerve root compression or disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sciatica.Study DesignCross-sectional diagnostic study.Patient SampleA total of 395 adult patients with severe disabling radicular leg pain of 6 to 12 weeks duration were included.Outcome MeasuresLumbosacral nerve root compression and disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging were independently assessed by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon blinded to any clinical information.MethodsData were prospectively collected in nine hospitals. History was taken according to a standardized protocol. There were no study-specific conflicts of interest.ResultsExploring the diagnostic odds ratio of 20 history items revealed a significant contribution in diagnosing nerve root compression for "male sex," "pain worse in leg than in back," and "a non-sudden onset." A significant contribution to the diagnosis of a herniated disc was found for "body mass index <30," "a non-sudden onset," and "sensory loss." Multivariate logistic regression analysis of six history items pre-selected from the literature (age, gender, pain worse in leg than in back, sensory loss, muscle weakness, and more pain on coughing/sneezing/straining) revealed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.71) for the model diagnosing nerve root compression and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.74) for the model diagnosing disc herniation.ConclusionsA few history items used in isolation had significant diagnostic value and the diagnostic accuracy of a model with six pre-selected items was poor.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…