-
- Mohammed Adris Razaq and Terasa Broom.
- Emergency Department, Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, UK.
- BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Jan 1; 2014: bcr-2014-204890.
AbstractThere is some controversy surrounding the optimal mode of imaging in trauma patients with suspected cervical (C) spine injury. Various rules (most notably the Canadian C-spine rules and the NEXUS rules) have been designed to help reduce the need for imaging given the poor yield. Some authorities advocate CT for almost all cases whereas others advocate three view radiographs unless the patient is at high risk, in which case CT is the preferred choice. One meta-analysis showed sensitivity of 58% (39-76%) for plain radiographs and 98% for CT in identification of C-spine injuries following blunt trauma. This case report illustrates how very unstable C-spine injuries may not be apparent on plain radiographs and a degree of clinical suspicion may be required for further imaging.2014 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..