• Br J Neurosurg · Oct 2004

    Reliability of diagnosis of soft cervical disc prolapse using Spurling's test.

    • K Chhanalal Shah and V Rajshekhar.
    • Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.
    • Br J Neurosurg. 2004 Oct 1; 18 (5): 480-3.

    AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Spurling's test in predicting the diagnosis of a soft lateral cervical disc prolapse. A prospective study was performed involving 50 patients with neck and arm pain; of these, 25 patients were managed surgically (Group 1) and the other 25 patients were managed conservatively (Group 2). A Spurling's test was performed in all patients and scored as positive or negative. In patients in Group 1, the operative findings were recorded as a soft or hard disc prolapse (osteophyte). In Group 2 patients, the MR findings were recorded as positive for a soft disc prolapse or negative (no disc prolapse or osteophyte only). The results of the Spurling's test were compared with the surgical or MR findings, which were considered as the gold standard. Spurling's test had a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 95% with positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.4% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.9% in predicting a diagnosis of a soft lateral cervical disc prolapse. The high positive predictive value of the test can be utilized to improve the yield of positive MR examinations in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…