• Guanxiong Ye, Yong Qin, Shengqian Xu, Chengjun Wu, Shi Wang, Debiao Pan, and Xinmei Wang.
• Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People Hospital of Lishui, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Lishui, 323000, China.
• Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 1; 8 (5): 7746-53.

AbstractThis work aims to compare the curative effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUSPLC) and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FPLC). 200 patients with cholecystolithiasis were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into TUSPLC group and FPLC group, 100 cases in each group, and the TUSPLC and FPLC was performed, respectively. The surgical time, intraoperative complication, conversions rate, postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic drug use, incision infection, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative cosmetic results in two groups were compared. The total conversion rate, conversion rate with Nassar grade II, and conversion rate with Nassar grade III in TUSPLC group were significantly higher than FPLC group (P < 0.01), and the incision cosmetic result after 1 month in TUSPLC group was obviously better than FPLC group (P < 0.01), but the surgical time in TUSPLC group was significantly longer than FPLC group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference of incision infection, intraoperative complication, and postoperative hospitalization time, incision pain in postoperative first and second day, postoperative use of analgesia drug and incision cosmetic result on discharge day between two groups (P > 0.05). TUSPLC has obvious advantage in treatment of Nassar grade I patients with cholecystolithiasis. It can be used as a supplement for standard laparoscopic gallbladder surgery. It is safe and feasible, without abdominal scar, thus achieving to excellent cosmetic result and high satisfaction in patients.

3 keywords...

hide…