• C A Grosz, R S Kempe, and M Kelly.
• The C. Henry Kempe National Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA.
• Child Abuse Negl. 2000 Jan 1; 24 (1): 9-23.

ObjectivesTo decrease the emotional distress of child victims of extrafamilial sexual abuse (ESA) and their families. To provide crisis intervention, individual and group treatment in response to an expressed need in the community. To pilot the use of group treatment for child victims of ESA under age 10.MethodThis discussion describes intervention with a sample of 246 child victims, ages 2-14 years, and 323 parents who participated in the program from 1984 to 1991. This pilot project operated at a university medical facility and was located off campus in an outpatient child abuse center. Priority was given to child victims under age 7. Child victims and their families were evaluated after investigative interviews by law enforcement agencies were completed. A treatment plan was developed based on clinical assessment. Families participated in crisis counseling, individual treatment for the child victim and/or parent, Children's Treatment Groups, Parent Support Groups, or were referred to other resources. Clinical assessment of treatment progress included weekly case review by child and parent therapists, video analysis and observation of Children's Treatment Group sessions, consultation with parents and collateral contacts.ResultsA family approach and services for parents in addition to intervention for child victims were determined to be key components in facilitating recovery. Clinical observations and client feedback showed positive outcomes for child victims and parents with crisis counseling, Children's Treatment groups, and Parent Support Groups. The extent of intervention ranged from one session to 24 months with an average participation of 6-9 months. Follow up surveys were returned by parents for 48 child victims and results are reported. Themes, parallels in responses, and recovery factors for child victims and parents are discussed.ConclusionsThe need for intervention and a community-based program was demonstrated by (1) the significant disruption in functioning that occurred for child victims of ESA and their families, (2) the risk for long term sequelae, (3) the high incidence of extrafamilial sexual abuse, and 4) the consistent, large number of requests for services. Family-centered crisis services, Children's Treatment Groups, and Parent Support Groups can be effectively based at child advocacy centers, out patient care clinics, or other community agencies. The results of formal outcome measures and longitudinal studies is needed to determine how child victims and parents benefit from specific treatment modalities and to better guide the use of limited resources.

18 keywords...

hide…